<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tidbit: Ad agencies and Intellectual Property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.theredpost.com/2008/12/18/tidbit-ad-agencies-and-intellectual-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.theredpost.com/2008/12/18/tidbit-ad-agencies-and-intellectual-property/</link>
	<description>a tech startup in goshen, indiana, takes on digital signage (and lots more)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: property in Vietnam</title>
		<link>http://blog.theredpost.com/2008/12/18/tidbit-ad-agencies-and-intellectual-property/comment-page-1/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>property in Vietnam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 14:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theredpost.com/?p=1504#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>Pretty interesting point of view. I guess, in the advertising industry where ad campaigns should always be &quot;out of the box&quot; and attractive to clients, there are so much competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty interesting point of view. I guess, in the advertising industry where ad campaigns should always be &#8220;out of the box&#8221; and attractive to clients, there are so much competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedPost/Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.theredpost.com/2008/12/18/tidbit-ad-agencies-and-intellectual-property/comment-page-1/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>RedPost/Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theredpost.com/?p=1504#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>[...] was responding to Danny&#8217;s comment on my ad agency/IP post and it&#8217;s truned into a full blown blog post. Danny said: And where did you get the idea [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was responding to Danny&#8217;s comment on my ad agency/IP post and it&#8217;s truned into a full blown blog post. Danny said: And where did you get the idea [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://blog.theredpost.com/2008/12/18/tidbit-ad-agencies-and-intellectual-property/comment-page-1/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theredpost.com/?p=1504#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>Well, this is actually changing, albeit VERY slowly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unions/groups (like AIGA) are encouraging agencies and designers to retain long-term rights for campaign-related material (exactly like the example of a 6-month ad campaign). The problem is, at least right now, is that so much of that work - especially in mid-size to smaller agencies - is tied to identity work, the rights for which should (maybe) be rightly tied to client (company). Photographers actually have a better time with this, since they are producing only a piece of the campaign, than agencies or designers do. That, and their copyright system is pretty well developed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It does make sense to maintain those long-term rights though, as you say, because it can bring in long-term revenue (roughly .2-.5% of any major ad buy).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And where did you get the idea (data) that a 6 month buy rarely returns that equivalent? I would think that more national campaigns return at that level than 20-year patents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is actually changing, albeit VERY slowly.</p>
<p>Unions/groups (like AIGA) are encouraging agencies and designers to retain long-term rights for campaign-related material (exactly like the example of a 6-month ad campaign). The problem is, at least right now, is that so much of that work &#8211; especially in mid-size to smaller agencies &#8211; is tied to identity work, the rights for which should (maybe) be rightly tied to client (company). Photographers actually have a better time with this, since they are producing only a piece of the campaign, than agencies or designers do. That, and their copyright system is pretty well developed.</p>
<p>It does make sense to maintain those long-term rights though, as you say, because it can bring in long-term revenue (roughly .2-.5% of any major ad buy).</p>
<p>And where did you get the idea (data) that a 6 month buy rarely returns that equivalent? I would think that more national campaigns return at that level than 20-year patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
